FORMAmrhart.org · curriculum into cognitive architecture
Back to the format index

Analytical architecture·Medium cognitive demand·20–40 minutes

Comparative Matrix

Hold cases and criteria in view simultaneously so comparison produces a reasoned judgment rather than two descriptions.

Knowledge
Comparative · Evaluative · Factual
Sequence
Guided Construction · Disciplinary Application
Interaction
Medium

Hold cases and criteria in view simultaneously so comparison produces a reasoned judgment rather than two descriptions. Comparative Matrix is selected when its reasoning mechanism matches an accepted learning requirement and produces evidence a teacher can inspect.

01How the architecture unfolds

  1. Define cases and comparison purpose.
  2. Choose criteria that apply to every case.
  3. Populate evidence cells without judging yet.
  4. Identify patterns, exceptions and interactions.
  5. Write a weighted comparative judgment.

02The work on each side

Teacher moves

  • Keep the target reasoning visible
  • Press for evidence at consequential decisions
  • Use the final product to diagnose the next move

Student moves

  • Notice
  • Construct
  • Test
  • Revise
  • Justify

03What would count as learning?

  • Every comparison uses shared criteria
  • The final judgment weighs differences rather than listing them

04Across the curriculum

History

Revolutions compared

Comparative Matrix applies its sequence to Revolutions compared so the disciplinary reasoning remains visible.

Biology

Adaptations across species

Comparative Matrix applies its sequence to Adaptations across species so the disciplinary reasoning remains visible.