Factual · Conceptual · Systems
Primer
Establish the minimum vocabulary and mental map students need before complexity is introduced.
These are not activities. Each pattern organises information around a particular cognitive demand, with clear conditions for when it should—and should not—be used.
The collection · 60 formats
Factual · Conceptual · Systems
Establish the minimum vocabulary and mental map students need before complexity is introduced.
Chronological · Procedural · Causal
Guide students through a process or chronology while making each transition and decision visible.
Conceptual · Evaluative · Ethical
Use a disciplined chain of questions to expose assumptions and refine a claim.
Evidential · Causal · Interpretive
Release evidence in a deliberate sequence so students must update an explanation rather than wait for the answer.
Systems · Causal · Spatial
Represent interacting parts, directions of influence, and feedback so the system can be reasoned about as a whole.
Evaluative · Causal · Ethical
Place students inside a bounded decision with incomplete information, competing priorities, and real consequences.
Procedural · Argumentative · Evidential
Model a complete performance while exposing the decisions, checks, and disciplinary reasoning inside it.
Argumentative · Evidential · Evaluative
Construct a defensible judgment by linking claims, selected evidence, warrants, counterclaims, and qualification.
Procedural · Evidential · Argumentative
Remove structured support in deliberate stages until students can perform the complete task independently.
Interpretive · Comparative · Evidential
Compare how positioned accounts select evidence, frame causation and assign significance differently.
Transfer · Conceptual · Procedural
Test whether students can recognise and apply the underlying architecture in a deliberately unfamiliar context.
Causal · Chronological · Comparative
Organise effects across groups, timescales and domains so students can reason about relative significance.
Evidential · Causal · Interpretive
Assemble fragmented evidence into a defensible account while keeping provenance and uncertainty visible.
Evidential · Evaluative · Interpretive
Test a source's claims, provenance and limits through structured examination and evidence-based verdicts.
Evidential · Argumentative · Evaluative
Progress from noticing evidence to explaining exactly how it changes the strength of a claim.
Conceptual · Comparative · Metacognitive
Infer a concept's defining attributes by comparing carefully chosen examples and non-examples.
Conceptual · Systems · Transfer
Use a familiar relational structure to enter an unfamiliar idea, then expose where the analogy fails.
Procedural · Metacognitive · Conceptual
Diagnose representative errors, identify the decision that produced them and rehearse a corrective routine.
Comparative · Evaluative · Factual
Hold cases and criteria in view simultaneously so comparison produces a reasoned judgment rather than two descriptions.
Causal · Chronological · Systems
Construct and test a mechanism-rich chain from conditions through triggers to outcomes.
Chronological · Causal · Evidential
Rebuild a chronology from partial records and use sequence to explain change, continuity and turning points.
Ethical · Evaluative · Comparative
Compare positioned evidence and priorities before making a decision that acknowledges distributional effects.
Causal · Evidential · Evaluative
Pit plausible explanations against shared evidence so students compare explanatory reach and residual problems.
Evidential · Causal · Comparative
Turn a dataset into a warranted explanatory narrative without hiding uncertainty, scale or counter-patterns.
Procedural · Comparative · Metacognitive
Compare methods on the same task so students learn when, why and under what constraints each method works.
Factual · Conceptual · Metacognitive
Retrieve connected knowledge across categories and time points, then repair gaps through comparison and explanation.
Conceptual · Spatial · Systems
Construct a disciplined visual-verbal model where each representation contributes distinct explanatory work.
Conceptual · Causal · Metacognitive
Elicit a predictable misconception, make its explanatory failure visible and replace it with a stronger model.
Conceptual · Systems · Metacognitive
Slow down at a transformative disciplinary idea and connect its language, examples, boundaries and consequences.
Evaluative · Evidential · Metacognitive
Compare varied exemplars against criteria so students internalise quality without copying one surface form.
Factual · Conceptual
Combine individually retrieved fragments into a shared connected model.
Factual · Systems
Distribute complementary expertise, then require a synthesis no group can produce alone.
Argumentative · Evidential
Prepare evidence, warrants and rebuttals before a bounded academic debate.
Interpretive · Argumentative
Develop and challenge ideas through a visible written dialogue before speaking.
Evaluative · Metacognitive
Use common criteria to inspect, annotate and improve visible work in progress.
Causal · Evaluative
Trace how consequential choices produce diverging outcomes under constraints.
Interpretive · Ethical
Interpret a shared event through evidence-bounded positional lenses.
Causal · Evaluative
Change one condition to test causal claims without drifting into fantasy.
Evidential · Comparative
Compare independent evidence to locate agreement, dependence and contradiction.
Comparative · Evaluative
Place cases on a criterion-based continuum and defend relative positions.
Metacognitive · Conceptual
Generate, improve and prioritise questions that can drive disciplined enquiry.
Conceptual · Evaluative
Compare explanatory models by assumptions, reach, evidence and failure points.
Procedural · Metacognitive
Allocate confidence to competing solutions, then diagnose and price their errors.
Conceptual · Comparative
Sort and resort examples to make category boundaries and relationships explicit.
Conceptual · Evidential
Search varied cases for a recurring structure and test candidate rules.
Procedural · Metacognitive
Repeat one consequential subskill with rapid feedback before reintegration.
Factual · Conceptual
Revisit essential knowledge across increasing intervals and varied cues.
Procedural · Transfer
Mix problem types so students must select a method rather than repeat one.
Conceptual · Metacognitive
Explain a model to a peer who must question relationships and omissions.
Conceptual · Metacognitive
Reconstruct and teach a bounded idea without notes to expose gaps and links.
Factual · Evidential
Collect disciplined observations before interpretation or judgment begins.
Evidential · Systems
Turn raw observations into categories, patterns and warranted findings.
Evaluative · Ethical
Evaluate a design against purpose, constraints and user evidence before revision.
Procedural · Transfer
Adapt a known method when time, materials or conditions change.
Ethical · Evaluative
Weigh principles, consequences and affected groups in a structured judgment.
Systems · Evaluative
Design and stress-test a policy against evidence, incentives and distributional effects.
Interpretive · Evaluative
Trace how formal choices construct meaning, position audiences and omit alternatives.
Metacognitive · Conceptual
Convert an experience into explicit principles through evidence-led reflection.
Metacognitive · Evidential
Track decisions, evidence and revisions across a sustained learning sequence.
Metacognitive · Evaluative
Use a short evidence-led conference to diagnose progress and agree the next move.