FORMAmrhart.org · curriculum into cognitive architecture
Back to the format index

Dialogic architecture·High cognitive demand·20–40 minutes

Socratic Dialogue

Use a disciplined chain of questions to expose assumptions and refine a claim.

Knowledge
Conceptual · Evaluative · Ethical · Argumentative
Sequence
Disciplinary Application · Independent Judgment
Interaction
High

A Socratic dialogue makes reasoning public. Questions are sequenced so that students must define terms, test implications, confront counterexamples, and revise the original claim rather than simply state opinions.

01How the architecture unfolds

  1. Offer a precise proposition.
  2. Ask for definitions and conditions.
  3. Test the proposition with a case.
  4. Introduce a counterexample.
  5. Require a revised proposition and supporting reason.

02The work on each side

Teacher moves

  • Ask one question at a time
  • Press for evidence and conditions
  • Record revisions without rewarding speed

Student moves

  • Define
  • Qualify
  • Challenge
  • Revise
  • Justify

03What would count as learning?

  • The final claim is more precise than the opening claim
  • Students can name what evidence would change their view

04Across the curriculum

English

Tragedy

Test whether a tragic protagonist must be responsible for their own downfall.

Science

Species

Use edge cases to refine what counts as a species and where the definition fails.