FORMAmrhart.org · curriculum into cognitive architecture
Back to the format index

Dialogic architecture·High cognitive demand·one lesson

Competing Narrators

Compare how positioned accounts select evidence, frame causation and assign significance differently.

Knowledge
Interpretive · Comparative · Evidential · Evaluative · Ethical
Sequence
Deliberate Practice · Disciplinary Application · Independent Judgment
Interaction
High

Competing narrators places interpretations beside one another so students can inspect how perspective, evidence selection and values shape the story being told without collapsing into unsupported opinion.

01How the architecture unfolds

  1. Establish the shared event or evidence base.
  2. Read the first positioned account.
  3. Read a contrasting account with the same evidence visible.
  4. Compare selection, language, causation and omission.
  5. Construct an evidence-based judgment about the disagreement.

02The work on each side

Teacher moves

  • Keep common evidence visible
  • Ask what each narrator must omit
  • Separate perspective from factual accuracy

Student moves

  • Attribute
  • Compare
  • Corroborate
  • Challenge
  • Judge

03What would count as learning?

  • Students identify how two accounts construct different significance
  • Students adjudicate a disagreement using evidence rather than preference

04Across the curriculum

History

Historical significance

Compare how contemporary groups and later historians explain why the same event mattered.

Media Studies

News framing

Trace how two outlets select images, agents and causal language to frame one protest.